<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Proactive SEO and PPC Blog &#187; SEO</title>
	<link>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog</link>
	<description>Make SEO PPC Web Analytics Services Affordable</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>PPC is almost 2 times better than SEO - A new study found</title>
		<link>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/14/ppc-is-almost-2-times-better-than-seo-a-new-study-found/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/14/ppc-is-almost-2-times-better-than-seo-a-new-study-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Shi</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/14/ppc-is-almost-2-times-better-than-seo-a-new-study-found/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new study by Engine Ready, based on traffic to 26 e-retail sites in a 12-month period that ended June 30, visitors who arrive at a retailer&#8217;s site from paid search ads are 50% more likely to buy than those who come from clicking on a natural search link. The conversion rate from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new study by Engine Ready, based on traffic to 26 e-retail sites in a 12-month period that ended June 30, visitors who arrive at a retailer&#8217;s site from paid search ads are 50% more likely to buy than those who come from clicking on a natural search link. The conversion rate from paid search is 2.03% versus 1.26% from organic search, according to the study as reported by Internet Retailer.</p>
<p>The report is based on an analysis of 20.8 million visits and 108 million page views to 26 e-commerce sites from July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>This study, identified and measured 4 primary traffic source categories that encapsulate all source origins:</p>
<p>* Organic listings<br />
* Paid listings<br />
* Direct access and bookmarks<br />
* Other referrer</p>
<p>Most likely to buy are consumers who navigate directly to a retailer&#8217;s site by typing in a URL or clicking on a bookmark, as their conversion rate registered at 7.38%. Consumers who came to an e-commerce site from another site or an e-mail converted at 6.58%, the study shows. The overall conversion rate was 3.6%. <b>(This means the PPC conversion rate is still much lower than direct access and bookmarks visits)</b></p>
<p>The study found that:</p>
<p>    * Paid search visitors bought the most, with an average order value of $117.06 versus $109.27 for those coming from other sites, $106.64 for visitors from organic search and $95.29 from direct referrals, such as from a bookmark or direct entry of a URL<br />
    * Average order value for all retailers in the study was $104.21, down 31.7% from a previous Engine Ready study that analyzed data from a two-year period that ended December 2007. Retailers said average order values from all channels have declined in the past 12 to 18 months<br />
    * The average time on a site per visit increased 5.8% from the previous study to 4 minutes, 33 seconds. Consumers who navigated directly to a site spent 5 minutes, 8 seconds. The study found consumers who spent more time on a site were more likely to buy, but that their average order value was not higher than that of other buyers<br />
    * Site visitors on average viewed 5.2 pages per visit, up 15.6% from the previous study. Those who came directly or from other sites or e-mail viewed the most pages, 6.2 on average<br />
    * Average number of seconds on a page dropped 9% from the earlier study to 53 seconds, which could be a sign marketers are doing a better job of presenting information on their pages in a more easily readable format, the study says. Paid search visitors spent the most time on a page, 66 seconds on average.<br />
    * 43.9% of all visitors left after viewing just one page, down slightly from 44.5% in the earlier study. Organic search produced the highest bounce rate, 48.5%, and direct access the lowest, 39.2%<br />
    * Direct access produced the largest share of site visits (40%), followed by other referring sites and e-mail (27.9%), paid search (19.8%) and organic search (12.3%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/14/ppc-is-almost-2-times-better-than-seo-a-new-study-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Get More Inbound Links?</title>
		<link>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/13/how-to-get-more-inbound-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/13/how-to-get-more-inbound-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Shi</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/13/how-to-get-more-inbound-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try to do the following searches in any search engine:
   1.  &#8220;exchange&#8221;
   2. `look for+{partner&#124;site&#124;link}&#8221;
   3. &#8220;reciprocal link&#8221;
   4. &#8220;{add&#124;submit}+{link&#124;site}&#8221;
   5. &#8220;backlink&#8221;
   6. &#8220;three way&#8221;
   7. or &#8220;link partner&#8221;
You should be able to find enough websites to get inbound links. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to do the following searches in any search engine:</p>
<p>   1.  &#8220;exchange&#8221;<br />
   2. `look for+{partner|site|link}&#8221;<br />
   3. &#8220;reciprocal link&#8221;<br />
   4. &#8220;{add|submit}+{link|site}&#8221;<br />
   5. &#8220;backlink&#8221;<br />
   6. &#8220;three way&#8221;<br />
   7. or &#8220;link partner&#8221;</p>
<p>You should be able to find enough websites to get inbound links. However, don&#8217;t overdo it otherwise your site will be identified as a web spam website and penalized by search engines.</p>
<p>Try to balance and vary your inbound links (from different sources and using different anchor texts) to make your link-building more natural so that the search engines will not see a pattern of spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/13/how-to-get-more-inbound-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media link building for SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/06/social-media-link-building-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/06/social-media-link-building-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Shi</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/06/social-media-link-building-for-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media sites can be a good source for your link building campaigns. Here are a few places that you might want to try:Twitter, Digg, and Reddit.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media sites can be a good source for your link building campaigns. Here are a few places that you might want to try:Twitter, Digg, and Reddit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proactiveseo.com.au/ppc-seo-blog/2009/08/06/social-media-link-building-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
